Arbitration has long been touted as a quicker, more cost-effective alternative to traditional litigation. Its rise in popularity has been supported by its inclusion in various consumer and business contracts. However, in practice, arbitration often falls short of its promises, creating significant barriers for individuals and small businesses seeking resolution. Here’s a deeper dive into the realities of arbitration and how it compares to other conflict resolution methods.
What Is Arbitration?
Arbitration is a method of resolving disputes outside the traditional court system. Unlike mediation, where parties retain control over the outcome, arbitration involves an arbitrator (or a panel of arbitrators) whose decision is final and binding.
In the U.S., the American Arbitration Association (AAA) is a leading provider of arbitration services. Arbitration is commonly used in employment contracts, service agreements, and consumer contracts. These agreements often require disputes to be resolved through arbitration rather than litigation, potentially excluding individuals from accessing the courts.
The perceived benefits of arbitration include faster resolution than court trials, expert arbitrators with knowledge of the relevant industry, and private and confidential proceedings.
The Costs and Challenges of Arbitration
While arbitration was initially designed to be cost-effective, modern practices reveal significant drawbacks. For example, arbitration filing fees can far exceed those of traditional court cases.
- Filing Fees: In Texas state district courts, the filing fee is typically $300–$400. By contrast, AAA filing fees for disputes over $9,000 can be as high as $4,400.
- Hearing Costs: For cases requiring hearings, additional costs can exceed $4,000, totaling around $8,000 just for fees.
These high costs disproportionately affect individuals and small businesses, making arbitration inaccessible for many. Unlike litigation, where taxpayers subsidize court operations, arbitration places the entire financial burden on the disputing parties.
Who Benefits from Arbitration?
In practice, arbitration often favors larger entities over individuals or small businesses. For example, homebuilders and other large corporations frequently include mandatory arbitration clauses in their contracts. These clauses deter individuals from pursuing claims due to high costs.
Additionally, some arbitration agreements have collective action restrictions and prevent individuals from joining class actions. These restrictions make it economically unviable for attorneys to represent clients in smaller, individual claims.
An illustrative case involved using arbitration clauses in employment agreements to prevent collective actions under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). While this strategy benefits employers, it limits employees' access to justice.
Arbitration vs. Mediation: Key Differences
A common misconception is that arbitration and mediation are interchangeable. They are distinct processes with unique implications. Arbitration results in a binding decision by an arbitrator; often expensive and lengthy.
Mediation requires a voluntary decision to resolve a dispute where settlement discussions are facilitated by a mediator, with no binding outcome unless the parties agree. Mediation is commonly ordered by Texas courts before trial and is often successful.
Conclusion
While arbitration is marketed as a streamlined alternative to litigation, its high costs and inherent advantages for large corporations have undermined its initial promise. Before agreeing to arbitration clauses in contracts, individuals and businesses should carefully evaluate their implications and consult with legal professionals.
All information provided on Silblawfirm.com (hereinafter "website") is provided for informational purposes only, and is not intended to be used for legal advice. Users of this website should not take any actions or refrain from taking any actions based upon content or information on this website. Users of this site should contact a licensed Texas attorney for a full and complete review of their legal issues.